Good morning patriot. It’s clear who’s leading — and who’s losing it.

👉 Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” is putting real money back in American pockets. Tax cuts, business growth, and no tax on tips? That’s America First policy in action.

👉 Stephen Miller drops the hammer on the Russia hoax — calling it what it was: a coordinated coup. Spoiler: the same deep state players are still at it.

👉 Cory Booker’s latest interview after going full meltdown on the Senate floor, blocks bipartisan bills, and blames Trump for everything short of the weather. Even his own party’s had enough.

It’s all connected: strong leadership, liberal lapdog media propaganda, and the chaos Democrats create when they’re losing control.

Let’s get into it. 🫡🇺🇸

Tax relief. Economic growth. Real wins for real Americans.

The White House dropped a deep-dive on Superstar President Donald Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” — and it’s exactly what conservatives hoped for: less taxes, more take-home pay, and a stronger economy from the ground up.

💰 Big Wins at Kitchen Tables

The bill’s historic tax cuts are helping families coast to coast.

Senator Deb Fischer (R-NE) says the average Nebraska household is saving $2,400 a year — money that goes to groceries, gas, and education, not to Washington.

🔁 It’s a simple formula:
✅ Cut taxes
✅ Empower workers
✅ Let Americans keep what they earn

🌽 From Farms to Fintech

Whether it’s rural Iowa or Silicon Valley, the bill is revving up key industries.

These aren’t talking points. They’re proof.

A Bill That Builds: Trump’s bill isn’t just about tax tables — it’s about building a secure, prosperous America.

📈 It’s helping:

All while keeping Washington’s hand out of your wallet.

🧠 The Bottom Line

The “Big Beautiful Bill” delivers:

Biden’s era was bloated government and reckless spending.
Trump’s putting power back in the hands of Americans.

Promises made. Promises kept. And the results? Undeniable.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller isn’t pulling punches.
In a Fox News, Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo, he called the Russia collusion saga: “The single greatest hoax and the greatest assault on our democracy in the history of this country.”

🔥 Strong words—but ones that hit home for conservatives who watched years of media hysteria, partisan investigations, and zero accountability.

It was a premeditated hit job, according to Miller...engineered by Clinton operatives, the intel community, and Obama-era holdovers.

He points to new intel from the DNI and FBI as proof:

“This meets all the criminal elements of a seditious conspiracy.”

Translation: It wasn’t just politics. It was a coordinated effort to sabotage Trump, plain and simple.

Will Anyone Pay: That’s the billion-dollar question.

Miller says the DOJ has what it needs to take down the “coup plotters and insurrectionists.”

But let’s be honest: Conservatives have been burned before—empty investigations, show trials, and a revolving door for bad actors.

So yeah, trust in justice? Running on fumes...

The Playbook’s Still Active: Miller didn’t stop at 2016.

He linked the Mar-a-Lago raid to the same political hit job—this time, to bury the truth.

“If we continue to create the impression… that there is not a severe criminal penalty, it will never stop.”

It’s not just about what happened. It’s about what keeps happening—because no one’s been held accountable.

Why it matters: Trump’s focused on ending the Ukraine war and rewriting broken trade deals. But Miller’s warning: None of that sticks if the deep state keeps skating.

The Russia hoax wasn’t just political theater—it was an attack on democracy itself. Conservatives know it. They’ve lived it.

And they’re still waiting for someone in power to do something about it.

What happened: New Jersey Senator Cory Booker exploded on the Senate floor last week, blasting his own party over bipartisan policing bills and accusing Superstar President Trump of “trashing our Constitution.”

Then he doubled down yesterday during a newly released CNN interview, claiming Trump is withholding public safety funds from blue states like New Jersey.

Reasons and Context: The Trump administration has justified the funding freeze as a means to enforce compliance with federal policies, particularly on issues like immigration and diversity programs.

For instance..

Diversity Programs: The administration has threatened to withhold funds from public schools unless they eliminate programs promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Immigration Policies: While some funding disputes relate to "sanctuary" city policies.

🚨 Booker says: “Trump’s cutting healthcare, police grants, and food for hungry kids.”

Let’s slow down there..

The real headline: Booker blocked bipartisan bills—yes, including ones his own committee helped write—because they didn’t cater enough to blue states.

Translation: He’s holding up police funding to score political points.

Booker claims Trump’s playing politics with grants.
But it’s hard to ignore the irony: Booker is doing the exact same thing.

Why Did Booker Block the Bills?

Booker’s primary concern was that the Trump’s Allstar Administration is withholding public safety grant funds from Democratic-leaning states, such as New Jersey, New York, and California, as a form of retaliation for their resistance to Trump’s immigration enforcement policies.

He argued: that these bills needed safeguards to ensure fair allocation of funds to all states, regardless of their political leanings.

To address this: Booker proposed an amendment to guarantee equal distribution of grant money, but this was labeled a "poison pill" by his colleagues, who saw it as an attempt to derail the legislation.

Criticism from Progressive Colleagues: Booker’s actions drew sharp criticism from fellow Democrats, including Senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Amy Klobuchar. They accused him of undermining carefully negotiated bipartisan efforts.

Cortez Masto pointed out: that Booker had missed a Judiciary Committee meeting where he could have raised his concerns earlier, suggesting his objections were more about political posturing than constructive input.

Klobuchar highlighted: what she saw as inconsistency, noting that Booker had previously supported similar measures but was now blocking them at a critical moment.

🤔 Posturing > Policy?

His liberal media lapdog interview hit all the progressive talking points:

📢 Booker even told his party: “History is going to remember these people for their complicity…”

Strong words...from the guy who is just angrily screaming and now his own party thinks he’s crazy.

(Side note: He ended the interview by plugging his 2026 re-election campaign website. Subtle.)